📸 The Great Travel Camera Debate

Here is the situation I find myself in every single time we travel: I own a Nikon D800, a Leica Q3, a Sony RX-10, and an iPhone 17 Pro Max. That is, objectively, too many cameras. And yet somehow, packing for a trip always involves the same impossible calculus: which one(s) comes with me, and which ones are sidelined at home.

Let me break down the contenders.

The DSLR (My Nikon D800): The One That Usually Stays Home

Let me be honest about something: my Nikon D800 is a magnificent camera that I almost never travel with anymore. It is heavy, bulky, and by the time I’ve stopped, unzipped the backpack, removed the camera, attached the lens, adjusted the settings, and raised it to my eye, the moment I wanted to photograph is gone.

It also weighs approximately as much as a small child. We do an unreasonable amount of walking when we travel, and carrying that thing 10 hours a day is just not feasible for me. So the D800 usually stays home.

Sidebar: If I know we’re going to be somewhere where I will want to do dedicated photography (wildlife, especially), I will bring it along. Places like Alaska and Africa.

If you are a professional photographer, or you have the patience of a saint and a very strong core, a full-frame DSLR or mirrorless camera will give you the best image quality available. The sensor size, the interchangeable lenses, the natural bokeh, the manual controls – there is genuinely no smartphone on earth that fully replicates what a serious camera can do. That gap is closing fast, but it hasn’t closed yet.

For everyone else: leave it at home.

The Leica Q3 and Sony RX-10: The Compromise Cameras

These are my middle ground options, and I travel with one or the other depending on what I think the day will require. The Leica Q3 is a fixed-lens camera – gorgeous image quality, compact enough to carry, but with zero zoom flexibility. The Sony RX-10 gives me zoom but at the cost of bulk and weight.

Here is the problem: whichever one I bring, I inevitably need the other one. This is not a camera problem. This is a Murphy’s Law problem, and no amount of careful planning has ever solved it.

The case for a dedicated travel camera – a mirrorless, a compact, a fixed-lens – is real if photography is a genuine priority for you and you’re willing to carry it every day without complaining. The image quality is meaningfully better than a phone in most situations, particularly in low light and when you want real depth of field. If you’re the kind of person who plans to print photos or shoot seriously, bring a real camera.

If you are going to leave it in the hotel room by day three because it’s too much hassle to carry around, don’t bother.

The iPhone 17 Pro Max: The One That’s Always With Me

Here’s the truth that every photographer eventually arrives at: the best camera is the one you have with you. And the one I have with me 99% of the time is my iPhone.

My new phone and the world’s most perfect case.

I recently upgraded from an iPhone 13 Pro Max to the 17 Pro Max, and the difference – particularly for travel photography – is significant. The zoom situation alone changed my street photography in ways I didn’t expect. The 13 had a 3x optical zoom that was, in practice, nearly useless for photographing anything farther than 10 feet away. The 17 Pro Max goes to 5x optical and all the way to 8x with the telephoto. For someone who loves street photography and requires a certain amount of stealth, this is a significant upgrade.

The low-light performance is dramatically better. The sensor is significantly larger. There’s a dedicated Camera Control button that launches the camera instantly – which matters more than it sounds when something catches your eye on a busy street and you have approximately two seconds to get the shot.

Does it replace a professional camera? No. The bokeh isn’t the same. The lens flexibility isn’t there. If you’re standing 400 meters from a subject or shooting the moon at midnight, a real camera wins every time. But for everything else – street photography, architecture, restaurant meals, landscape, portraits, the spontaneous moments that make up most of travel – the iPhone 17 Pro Max is genuinely extraordinary.

So What’s the Answer?

After years of traveling with every camera configuration imaginable, here is where I’ve landed:

Bring your phone and one dedicated camera. Not two. Not a full camera bag. One. If you know you’ll have time and subject matter (aka wildlife), bring the DSLR. For zoom and versatility, bring a compact mirrorless or a superzoom like the Sony RX-10. And if you love the look of prime lenses and don’t mind the constraint, something like the Leica Q3. And if you’re not a serious photographer and you have a current iPhone in your pocket, honestly – you might not need anything else at all.

What camera(s) do you bring with you when you travel?

Cheers! 📸

Comments

18 responses to “📸 The Great Travel Camera Debate”

  1. When we travel together, I could literally leave it all behind: your pictures are the only ones I share. ❤️

  2. When we travel together I could very well leave it all behind: Your pictures are the only ones I share! ❤️

    1. You know I’m always happy to be the group photographer, Amiga!

  3. Fabulous overview of the ongoing travel camera dilemma. I have purchased a variety of cameras over time but, lately, I keep coming back to my iPhone (16 Pro). It’s always with me, always ready, and so easy to use. I took an online workshop that Scott Kelby presented a few years ago about traveling with an iPhone and the amazing shots he was able to get with his. It convinced me that, until the camera gods invent something better, that’s the way I’ll go. (Although I absolutely agree that a DSLR is the only way to go in places like Alaska and Africa.)

    1. Thanks Janis. And I suspect the camera gods are working on inventing something better all the time. I’ve been blown away by the updates/changes to the 17 Pro Max camera.

  4. I’ve swapped my gear over the years for lighter, smaller options. However if you want interchangeable lenses they’re the problem, they’re heavy, especially quality zooms. I have to have them with me as I’m looking to have image files I can sell. I’m happy using my iPhone for blog shots but my compromise is a Sony RX100 mk6. It’s small, zooms out to 200mm and saves RAW images that pass quality control with my stock agency. Another bonus is that people are happier letting me photograph them with it, or my phone. I get a lot more people saying ‘no’ if I put my DSLR if front of them. You’re getting it right because I’m always impressed with the pics throughout your travel blogs.

    1. Yeah, lenses are a big issue. And they are HEAVY. Interesting that you get more “no” when you have your DSLR with you. I wonder if it makes them feel like you’re a reporter or such?

  5. Gary Newell Avatar
    Gary Newell

    I have the perfect solution – I’m not going to bring any. I’m going to travel with you and let you be one to have to solve that “impossible calculus”! I’m confident you, being the good friend you are, will share your pictures. Problem solved!

    1. You know I will share all of my pics, Gary. Hell, I might even have one blown up to a ridiculous size for you. 😘

  6. Gary Newell Avatar
    Gary Newell

    BTW, which camera did you decide to use to take the picture of your phone. I know which one it wasn’t. Inquiring minds want to know!

    1. I used Ken’s phone!

  7. Murphy’s Law indeed! You just never know. But for me it definitely depends on if I’m on foot or not. I’ve got a major heavy zoom but leave that for wildlife.

    1. For sure – the heavy zoom is going to come with us to Africa next year. Hell, I may even bring multiple cameras on that trip! Cheers.

  8. I’m with you on the hassle of carrying and using a DSLR – so much so that I’ve never even considered buying one! But I do prefer a ‘real’ camera over a phone for most situations. I have two and which one I travel with depends on where I’m going. We’re currently on a city break in Budapest and for a short trip like this my compact Panasonic Lumix is ideal. It has a decent lens and good zoom, but it’s small enough to tuck into my handbag. But for a longer trip, and especially if wildlife or expansive landscapes are involved, I take my other Lumix, a fixed lens camera with an excellent long zoom and lots of options for creativity if I so desire. But in that situation I’ll also tuck the compact into my suitcase. It may never see the light of day but I like to know I have a backup if the main one develops a fault or (Heaven forbid!) I lose it.

    1. I agree, Sarah. And I think that’s what it boils down to. Larger/heavier cameras for dedicated shooting – wildlife, etc. Small camera/phone for walkabouts. Another issue I forgot to mention is heat. If it’s hot outside, I’m not lugging big a camera around. Cheers!

  9. I bring 3 now… My phone, my Sony A7R and my new action camera. The action I use for time lapse and if I am going to do something a bit physical like a bike a ride. The A7 is my preference, gives you the option to swap lens and is not as heavy or bulky as a SLR. The phone though takes better pics of food..

    The above does take up a lot of space though..

    1. The Sony A7R looks like a great camera – with the added bonus of being much smaller than the SLRs. But you’re right about the phone taking incredible food pics. Cheers!

  10. Kim Sullivan Avatar
    Kim Sullivan

    I love and appreciate that you share this information. I used to have a G9 that I adored, and then… cell phones. Not as good a quality. But not enough that I’ve invested again. Your Leica Q3 has me interested.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Flask Half Full

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading