I don’t know what I was thinking. I mean, I knew it was going to be hot. But I didn’t think it would be Vatican hot (for reference, this is approximately two degrees less than the surface of the sun, and my new metric for unbearable heat). I cannot stand being hot. I’m Nordic – I have no business being in the sun, or the heat. AND, I’m in the throes of menopause, so I burst into flames every 20 minutes or so, anyway. So I’m not sure what part of my brain wasn’t firing for me to think cruising the Mediterranean in June would be a good idea.
The brochure looked so nice. 😉
Heat aside, the trip would have been a home run had Anna not gotten the ick to end all icks for six days of it. But, now we have a good story to tell.
So, The Cruise
A few of you have asked for our itinerary. We sailed on the Explora II, which is owned by MSC. Here’s the map of where we went:

I don’t have a lot of cruise experience – my only source for comparison is a cruise to Italy and Greece we took a couple of years ago on the Norwegian Gem. And while we had a great time on the cruise (because we were with the best traveling companions), I wasn’t crazy about the large size of the ship – and all of the people crammed onto said ship.


So, I started looking into smaller cruise ships for this trip. Here’s a side-by-side comparison between the two ships:

At first glance, the two ships don’t look that different in size. But check the gross tonnage (a ship’s internal volume). The Gem is quite a bit bigger. And more gross tonnage = more room for people.
| Feature | Explora II (Explora Journeys) | Norwegian Gem (Norwegian Cruise Line) |
|---|---|---|
| Cruise Line Type | Luxury | Mainstream |
| Passenger Capacity | 922 guests | 2,394 guests |
| Gross Tonnage | 63,900 GT | 93,530 GT |
| Length | 813 feet / 248 meters | 965 feet / 294 meters |
| Crew-to-Passenger Ratio | 1.25:1 | 1:2 |
| Suites vs. Cabins | All suites, all oceanfront | Mix of suites, balconies, oceanview & inside cabins |
| Average Stateroom Size | 377 sq ft | Starts at ~140 sq ft for inside cabins |
| Dining | 9 culinary experiences; no buffets | Specialty & main dining rooms + buffet |
| Included in Fare | Fine dining, all beverages, gratuities, Wi-Fi, wellness | Most dining & entertainment; extra cost for drinks, Wi-Fi, tips |
| Price Point (typical) | $$$$ (ultra-luxury) | $$ (mid-tier) |
Things I didn’t like about Norwegian:
- It was crowded. There were 2,394 people on board. And it felt like there were 2,394 people on board.
- Embarkation and debarkation were a hellscape. Long lines in a hot tent. I can’t believe I paid money for this experience.
- Tendering was a nightmare. No organization, lines to board stretched down the hallways.
- All of the add-ons and up-sells. Drinks and wi-fi were not included. And someone was always trying to take our picture in front of a silly fake palm tree background. And then trying to sell us a package of 6 dozen 4×6 glossies.
- The self-serve buffet and beverage situation. Not a fan of buffets. Because, germs. I’ve seen too many people act like Neanderthals at buffets. And the coffee on board was legit awful.
Things I liked about Explora (which mostly solved the things I didn’t like about Norwegian):
- It never felt crowded. There were 922 people on board, and honestly, I don’t know where they all were.
- Embarkation and debarkation were super smooth. No lines, no hot tents.
- Tendering was organized and easy. You wait in an air-conditioned lounge (with drinks service!) for your small group to be called. Then you walk right onto the tender.
- That said, there’s nothing you can do to make me enjoy tendering. You’re still bobbing around in a hot lifeboat while you make the dash toward land.
- Drinks and wifi were included. So were gratuities. Huzzah!
- No one tried to take our picture, ever.
- The food on board was incredible. There were several full service restaurants – all included. And there is no buffet – it’s a “food emporium”. All of the food was entirely behind glass (so people can’t put their grubby fingers on anything) and staffed by super friendly people from around the world.
The Bottomline (if you can have a bottomline after two cruises) on Cruising
Having had a grand total of two cruising experiences, I have decided this: cruising is a catch-22. On the plus side, cruising allows you to see a lot of places in a short period of time. And you only have to unpack once – a BIG plus for me. But, the downside is, you are never in a place long enough to get to know it. To wit: only spending five hours in Florence didn’t even scratch the surface. I felt like we were in a race to see things and ended up seeing nothing.
No cruise is ever going to be as immersive as land travel. Nature of the beast. That said, cruising does give you a great introduction/overview of a place. Then you can decide if you want to return and immerse yourself further in a particular city or country. For example, I’m super glad I had the opportunity to visit Tunis, but don’t need to go there again. It was chaotic, and shockingly dirty. Conversely, the half-day we spent in Carloforte, Sardinia was incredible. It was quiet and charming. We would absolutely return there and stay for a few days and explore more of the island.
With the exception of the spa (I enjoy a good massage from time to time), I don’t use very many of the ship’s amenities. I don’t like the sun or the water, so you aren’t going to find me hanging out by the pool. I’m not into gambling, so I don’t go to the casino. And there is no world where I’m getting up at 0600 for hot yoga.
BUT, what I did enjoy on our at sea days on Explora was finding a quiet place where I could sit in the shade and the breeze, read a book, and watch the world go by. And if someone wanted to offer me a cold beverage, well, who was I to argue?

Ultimately, you have to find the style of cruising (and cruise line) that’s right for you. I’m sure you’ve seen pictures of the mega cruise ships – Royal Caribbean’s Icon of the Seas has 7,600 people aboard what is essentially a floating amusement park/petri dish. Absofuckinglutely not. I’m not likely to go on another mainstream cruise – too big, too many people. But I think I may have found my Goldilocks cruise type with the Explora (and the like) category.
Would I go on another Explora cruise? Absolutely. But moving forward, if I ever talk about going to southern Europe in the summer again, I have instructed my family and friends to simply say these words to me: Vatican hot. Future summer travel will be to places like Canada, Greenland, northern Europe, and the southern hemisphere.
What’s next on our travel schedule?
This fall, we are going on a river cruise (our first) on Viking – from Budapest to Bucharest. We are laying over for a couple of days in Istanbul, and then another couple of days in Budapest before we sail. It’ll be October, so I’m looking forward to sweaters and not sweating.
Cheers!

Ugh. I had no idea cruise ships housed that many people. I’ve never been on a cruise but it’s nice to know that there are more reasonable options out there!
Most of these cruise ships are like floating cities! It’s crazy.
Well, I have never had an itch to go on a cruise, and you’ve done well to move it further down the list. Although, I have heard the river cruises are awesome, so I’ll await your reports 😊Maggie
This will be our first river cruise. I really hope we like it because some of the other itineraries look intriguing. We’ve been warned we will probably be the youngest people on the ship. Stay tuned!
That’s a great review and a really interesting read. It’s a strange one cruising. We’ve done it once. Flew to Miami in December, sailed around the Dutch Caribbean for 11 days (with Royal Caribbean on a BIG boat, think Ice rink, theatre, wave rider etc. etc) and visited Bonaire, Curacao and Aruba. As you say, you get long enough ashore to get as far as the tourist tat shops but before you know it, it’s time to leave again. I enjoyed the sea days more than the ports we called at. We would normally walk miles on a holiday but life aboard the boat was great. Strange thing is though, we both agree it’s one of our favourite holidays over the last few years. Having said that, we’ve done nothing to try and book another cruise since. MSC sound like a good company to consider if we do cruise again. I’ve checked their web site since reading this and the prices are along the lines of the other cruise lines over here. I see they cruise to the Norwegian Fjords which is something we’ve been seriously considering. My sister cruised there and came back buzzing. Plus I can’t see how I’d visit there, other than on a cruise. I’m glad you had a good experience, sickness aside. BTW West Ham won today!!
If you’re looking into Scandinavian cruises, do check out Explora. They have a new ship, the Explora IV, that will be cruising in Scandinavia. I would definitely sign up for that.
Over on this side of the pond, American college football kicked off this weekend, and NFL starts on Thursday. So America will have tunnel vision until after the Super Bowl. I have zero love for the NFL, but we do follow our college teams – NAVY and Nebraska.
Thanks for a great read and comparison. Methinks I would totally agree. I never get seasick on water but somehow feel uncomfortable away from land 🙂 ! have been on two stormy cruises in the Pacific with no great desire for a repeat but would just love to do a few river cruises, perchance on the Rhone river for food and wine and history most of all 🙂 !
We’re really looking forward to our river cruise. Hoping we love it because I’d like to explore some more rivers! Cheers!
I cannot imagine ever wanting to be stuck on a ship with 7,599 other people! Even your 922 on the Explora II sounds a lot after the 128 we had on the Ocean Explorer, but from all you say it seems a much pleasanter option than the larger ships. We’re in no hurry to do more cruising in the immediate future (unless I can convince my husband to do the Quark expedition to Greenland!) but it’s something I have my eye on for the future as our circumstances change. Certainly I like the idea of unpacking and staying in one place for a while!
As I get older, I have less enthusiasm for multiple hotel changes, so there may be more cruises in our future. The right answer for me is probably a balance between cruising and not cruising.
Your Quark expedition sounds like it was a home run! Greenland is on my radar, as well. Cheers!
I can live with all the hotel changes and living out of a suitcase at present but I do think we may tire of it one day.
Cruises nah….heat yeah….
What about heat ON a cruise? 😉😉
Nah
I really have nothing to say. Just wanted to see if it would accept any name.
OK, Mr. I Sheetmyfunnypants . . .
[…] is a double-edged sword. One of the things I like most about cruising (well, the two cruises I’ve been on, anyway) is […]